The Reserve Bank of India’s reported submission to a Parliamentary panel—that private cryptocurrencies should not be legalised—is consistent with its long-held view.
More importantly, it reflects a careful assessment of financial stability rather than an aversion to technology.The debate is often framed as innovation versus regulation. That is the wrong framework.
The real question is whether India should accord legal legitimacy to an asset class that remains highly speculative, lightly regulated globally, and incapable of performing the basic functions of money in a stable manner.
The numbers tell the story.Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency, has experienced multiple drawdowns exceeding 70% since its inception. Such volatility makes it unsuitable as a store of value or a medium of exchange.
Stablecoins, which were meant to solve this problem, have also faced crises, most notably the collapse of TerraUSD in 2022, which wiped out tens of billions of dollars in investor wealth and triggered wider market contagion.The industry has also witnessed the spectacular failures of major players such as FTX, Celsius and Voyager.
These were not fringe entities—they were among the largest names in global crypto. Their collapse exposed weak governance, conflicts of interest and inadequate risk management, underscoring how immature the ecosystem remains.
For India, the stakes are even higher.Households are increasingly becoming participants in financial markets through mutual funds, equities and systematic investment plans. Encouraging widespread participation in an asset class characterised by extreme price swings and regulatory uncertainty could undermine years of progress in promoting disciplined household investing.
There are also macroeconomic concerns. If private cryptocurrencies gain wider acceptance, they could complicate monetary policy transmission, facilitate capital flight and weaken oversight of cross-border financial flows. For an emerging economy with managed capital controls, these are not theoretical risks—they are policy challenges with real economic consequences.
Supporters argue that crypto cannot be ignored because it is global. That is true. But acknowledging its existence is very different from granting it legal recognition. India’s current approach already permits investment in crypto while subjecting it to taxation and tighter anti-money laundering norms. Legalisation would represent a far more significant policy endorsement.
The argument that India risks missing the next wave of innovation is also overstated. Blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies are not synonymous. Distributed ledger technology has promising applications in trade finance, supply chains, digital identity and financial infrastructure.
The RBI’s own Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) initiative demonstrates that digital innovation can coexist with monetary sovereignty.The lesson from the past decade is that technological innovation should be encouraged, but financial regulation cannot be an afterthought.
Markets function on trust. Trust depends on transparency, governance and accountability—areas where much of the crypto ecosystem continues to fall short.India’s policymakers should therefore resist calls for premature legalisation.
The objective should be to foster innovation while protecting financial stability, retail investors and the integrity of the monetary system.For now, the RBI’s cautious stance is not a barrier to innovation. It is prudent risk management.
“Biznewsweek is free for everyone. If you value independent, evidence-based business commentary, please consider supporting our work.”