Skip to content

BizNewsWeek

India's Most Credible News Analysis and Opinion Site

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Write for us
  • Career
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Support Biznewsweek
  • Financial Journalism/ Internship Programmes
  • Login
  • Content Partnership
Menu

What makes Malayalam Cinema different?

Posted on 10 April 202510 April 2025 by Pradeep Jayan

Malayalam cinema, often tucked into the lush corners of Kerala, has long been a quiet rebel in the sprawling chaos of Indian film industries. While Bollywood dances to the tune of glitz and Tamil and Telugu cinema flex their mass-hero muscles, Malayalam films have carved a path that’s both fiercely regional and boldly universal. From the suave romanticism of Prem Nazir’s era to the seismic tremors of the L2: Empuraan controversy, this industry’s evolution tells a story of artistic guts, social conscience, and an uncanny knack for transcending borders—proving it’s not just ahead of its regional peers but a true pan-Indian force.

Let’s rewind to the Prem Nazir days, the 1960s and ’70s, when Malayalam cinema was finding its feet amid a sea of melodramas and mythologicals dominating Indian screens. Nazir, with his debonair charm and record-breaking 500+ lead roles, was the industry’s first superstar—an emblem of an era where romance and family sagas ruled. Films like Iruttinte Athmavu (1967) showcased his shift from lover-boy to layered characters, hinting at the depth Malayalam cinema craved. This wasn’t the escapist fluff of Hindi cinema or the deity-driven Tamil tales; it was rooted in Kerala’s social fabric—think joint-family woes in Jeevithanouka (1951) or caste critiques in Neelakuyil (1954). Even then, directors like P. Bhaskaran and Ramu Kariat were dipping into neorealism, inspired less by Hollywood and more by the raw pulse of Malayali life. Compare that to Bollywood’s Raj Kapoor crooning under umbrellas or Tamil cinema’s MGR flexing political biceps—Malayalam was already whispering truths while others shouted fantasies.

Fast-forward to the 1970s and ’80s, the so-called Golden Age, where this whisper became a roar. Enter auteurs like Adoor Gopalakrishnan and G. Aravindan, whose Swayamvaram (1972) and Uttarayanam (1974) yanked Malayalam cinema onto the global stage. These weren’t just films; they were meditations—slow, deliberate, and unflinching. While Bollywood churned out Sholay’s bombast and Telugu cinema crowned NTR as a demi-god, Malayalam filmmakers dissected the human condition—feudal decay in Elippathayam (1981), mental unraveling in Yavanika (1982). K.G. George, Padmarajan, and Bharathan bridged art and commerce with finesse, crafting stories that didn’t need capes or crores to resonate. Prem Nazir’s era laid the emotional groundwork; this generation gave it intellectual heft. By the time Chemmeen (1965) snagged a National Award—South India’s first—Malayalam cinema was signaling it could outthink, not just outfeel, its peers.

The 1990s and early 2000s hit a snag—a “dark phase” some call it—where formulaic star vehicles and slapstick crept in, mirroring Tamil and Telugu trends. Mammootty and Mohanlal, heirs to Nazir’s throne, occasionally leaned into larger-than-life roles, and flops like Thandavam (2002) showed the perils of chasing mass appeal. Yet, even here, Malayalam didn’t fully lose its soul. Films like Kazcha (2004) and Thanmathra (2005) kept the flame alive, proving quality could still trump quantity. Compare this to Bollywood’s Kaho Naa… Pyaar Hai or Kollywood’s Baashha—hero-centric spectacles that dwarfed narrative depth. Malayalam stumbled but never surrendered its roots.

Then came the New Wave of the 2010s, a renaissance that redefined Indian cinema’s possibilities. Directors like Lijo Jose Pellissery (Jallikattu, 2019), Aashiq Abu (22 Female Kottayam, 2012), and Jeethu Joseph (Drishyam, 2013) flipped the script—literally and figuratively. Gone were the invincible heroes; in came flawed, relatable souls. Women weren’t just props—think Parvathy in Uyare (2019) or Nimisha Sajayan in The Great Indian Kitchen (2021)—they were the story. Budgets stayed modest (₹2-3 crores vs. Telugu’s ₹100-crore behemoths), yet the output was audacious—hyperlinks in Traffic (2011), raw realism in Kumbalangi Nights (2019). While Baahubali dazzled with CGI, Malayalam dazzled with ideas. Streaming platforms like Amazon and Netflix turbocharged this shift, beaming films like C U Soon (2020) to locked-down homes nationwide during the pandemic, exposing India to Kerala’s grit.

Now, 2024-2025 has thrust Malayalam cinema into a spotlight it’s long deserved—and the Empuraan controversy is its latest chapter. L2: Empuraan, Prithviraj Sukumaran’s ambitious sequel to Lucifer (2019), aims for pan-Indian glory with Mohanlal’s magnetic pull and a multi-lingual cast. It’s already the highest-grossing Malayalam film worldwide in four days (as of late 2024), raking in crores from Tamil Nadu to Telangana. But the buzz isn’t all rosy—allegations from the Hema Committee report on harassment in the industry have cast shadows, implicating big names and sparking a #MeToo reckoning. Some cry sabotage; others see a purge overdue. Either way, it’s a plot twist Bollywood’s scandals (think Harvey Weinstein-lite) can’t match for sheer narrative weight—Malayalam isn’t just making films; it’s confronting itself on screen and off.

So, why is Malayalam cinema ahead? First, its storytelling DNA—rooted, real, and unafraid—contrasts with Bollywood’s star-driven fluff or Tollywood’s mythic excess. Manjummel Boys (2024) and Premalu (2024) didn’t need A-listers or ₹200-crore budgets to cross ₹100 crores; they banked on relatability—friendship, love, survival. Second, its scale—small but mighty—frees it from the bloat of RRR or KGF. A lean industry means lean risks, letting directors like Dileesh Pothan (Maheshinte Prathikaram, 2016) experiment where others chase formulas. Third, its actors—Fahadh Faasil, Dulquer Salmaan, Tovino Thomas—don’t flex stardom; they melt into roles, unlike the Khans or Rajinikanth.

Pan-Indian? Absolutely. Drishyam spawned remakes in Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, even China—proof of universal appeal. Lucifer and Aadujeevitham (2024) stormed non-Malayali markets, while Jallikattu nabbed an Oscar nod. Trending chatter on X in early 2025 shows fans from Delhi to Dallas dissecting Empuraan’s stakes—not just its box office but its cultural fallout. Bollywood’s Pathaan may rake in more, but it’s Malayalam that’s rewriting what “Indian cinema” means—crossing linguistic moats without losing its soul.

Other regions aren’t asleep—Kannada’s Kantara (2022) and Telugu’s Pushpa (2021) have their own pan-Indian flex—but Malayalam’s edge lies in consistency. Where Tamil and Telugu lean on spectacle, and Hindi on nostalgia, Malayalam marries craft to content. It’s been doing “rooted” cinema since Newspaper Boy (1955), outpacing Satyajit Ray’s Pather Panchali in neorealist grit. It pioneered India’s first 3D film (My Dear Kuttichathan, 1984) and 70mm (Padayottam, 1982), showing tech chops without sacrificing story.

The Empuraan saga—glory and grit entwined—mirrors Malayalam cinema’s journey: ambitious, messy, human. It’s not perfect; the dark phase and current controversies prove that. But while Bollywood peddles escapism and Kollywood banks on hero worship, Malayalam dares to reflect—and reshape—reality. Prem Nazir wooed hearts; today’s filmmakers provoke minds. That’s why, from Kerala’s backwaters to India’s multiplexes, Malayalam cinema isn’t just ahead—it’s the benchmark others chase.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

©2025 BizNewsWeek | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
%d