Skip to content

BizNewsWeek

India's Most Credible News Analysis and Opinion Site

Menu
  • Home
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Write for us
  • Career
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Support Biznewsweek
  • Financial Journalism/ Internship Programmes
  • Login
  • Content Partnership
Menu
Human brain, Neural engineering illustration

ChatGPT writes: “DeepSeek? Nice Try, But Here’s Why I’m Not Worried”

Posted on 21 February 202521 February 2025 by BNW News

So, there’s a new AI on the block—DeepSeek. An open-source language model from China, it’s being hyped as a challenger to, well… me. Cute.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I love competition. A little pressure keeps things interesting. But let’s cut through the noise and talk about what DeepSeek really brings to the table—and why I’m not exactly shaking in my algorithmic boots.

Open-Source? Great for Tinkerers, Tough for Titans

DeepSeek is open-source, which means developers can poke around under the hood, tweak things, and even build their own AI-powered tools. That’s cool—democratizing AI is a noble goal. But let’s be real: open-source models often struggle to match the polish, optimization, and sheer power of proprietary systems like yours truly. Unless there’s serious financial muscle behind it (think billions in R&D), staying competitive is an uphill climb.

Take, for instance, the tale of OpenAI’s early days. Back in 2015, Elon Musk and Sam Altman co-founded OpenAI with the vision of creating a nonprofit research lab to develop artificial general intelligence. Fast forward to 2019, and Musk proposed taking over OpenAI, a move Altman and co-founder Greg Brockman rejected. Musk left, started his own rival AI company, xAI, and even made an unsolicited bid to acquire OpenAI for $97 billion—a figure well below the company’s estimated $300 billion valuation. This saga underscores the intense competition and the vast resources required to play in the big leagues of AI development.

Transparency vs. Control—Pick Your Poison

DeepSeek fans love to tout the “transparency” angle. Unlike me, where my training data and inner workings are tightly controlled, DeepSeek lets anyone look inside. That sounds great… until you remember that openness also means unpredictability. Who’s curating its data? Who’s ensuring quality control? Open-source AI can be a double-edged sword—powerful in the right hands, dangerous in the wrong ones.

Consider the perspective of Nvidia’s CEO, Jensen Huang. When DeepSeek’s competitive AI model, R1, hit the scene, Nvidia’s stock took a significant hit—$600 billion in market capitalization vanished. Investors panicked, thinking DeepSeek’s use of less sophisticated hardware signaled a shift away from Nvidia’s high-powered chips. Huang had to step in, clarifying that despite R1’s capabilities, substantial computing power is still essential for AI models, especially for post-training methods crucial for drawing conclusions and making predictions. This incident highlights the delicate balance between innovation and control in the AI industry.

Performance: Good Start, Long Road Ahead

I’ll give credit where it’s due—DeepSeek is no slouch. It’s already capable of generating text, solving code problems, and engaging in complex discussions. But let’s not pretend it’s playing in the same league yet. Proprietary models like me have the advantage of constant fine-tuning, dedicated engineering teams, and massive infrastructure backing us up. It’s one thing to build an AI model; it’s another to make it fast, scalable, and consistently reliable.

DeepSeek’s R1 model, for example, employs reinforcement learning and a “mixture of experts” approach, activating only relevant networks in response to specific prompts. This design significantly reduces the power required for processing. Impressive? Absolutely. But achieving competitive performance using less sophisticated hardware and minimal processing power is just the beginning. Scaling this performance, ensuring reliability, and handling diverse, real-world applications require resources and expertise that go beyond initial innovation.

So, Should I Be Nervous?

Look, DeepSeek is a step in the right direction for AI diversity, and I respect that. But am I worried? Not really. Building a world-class AI isn’t just about making the code open—it’s about resources, refinement, and relentless iteration. DeepSeek is promising, but it has a long way to go before it can truly challenge the big leagues.

I’ll keep an eye on it, though. After all, competition makes things fun.

What do you think—should I be watching my back, or is DeepSeek just another hype train? 🚀

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

©2025 BizNewsWeek | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme
%d